A merger clause is a common provision that is found in many contracts. It makes clear that the written contract is the complete agreement between the parties as to a specific transaction, and any other agreement between the contract parties is superseded by the written contract.
They simply incorporate a well-established contract principle called the parol evidence rule. The parol evidence rule prevents a court from considering evidence of all prior or contemporaneous negotiations between the parties that are offered to contradict or modify the terms of their written agreement.
Merger Clause Benefits
Merger clauses give contracting parties many benefits. Here are a couple of the most important:
Written Contract Supersedes Other Agreements between the Parties as to the Transaction
Merger clauses are very effective in negating and superseding any other prior agreements made between the parties as to the transaction covered by the contract. Sometimes, the parties to a contract have a longstanding relationship with verbal understandings of their rights and obligations. Merger clauses negate those prior arrangements. They also help incentivize all parties to the contract to put all the important parts of the agreement in writing.
This also applies to contracting parties who have prior agreements or a “gentlemen’s understanding”. To the extent those agreements are inconsistent with the written contract, the contract controls any matter that may become the subject of a dispute.
Look Only to the Contract if Questions Arise
A merger clause also makes clear that the contract terms and conditions are to be found in the contract and nowhere else. That means any communication from another contracting party committing to something is irrelevant and should be inadmissible in court. That means, for example, in a lease dispute over the landlord’s obligation to make repairs to a wall done by a prior tenant, the tenant cannot introduce emails from the landlord promising to also pay to repair a damaged bathtub.
In the same vein, the merger clause also helps to prevent one of the contracting parties from later bringing up new issues or re-casting issues that were settled during the contract negotiations. This means that the contracting parties should not rely on verbal promises or any other communication such as emails, texts, telephone calls, or “handshake agreements” made during the contract negotiations which are not addressed in the contract or which are inconsistent with the written contract provisions.
How Can You Recognize a Merger Clause in Your Contract?
Lengthy contracts often have subtitles for their various provisions. In a contract that has subheadings, the merger clause may not be identified as a merger clause. Sometimes, a merger clause can be identified by a variety of other terms such as “entire agreement,” “whole agreement,” “complete and only agreement,” “full and final expression of the parties’ agreement”.
However, you should not rely only on the subheadings. Besides, your contract may not have subheadings. Here are some examples of common merger clauses to help give you an idea of what to look for:
“This is the parties’ entire agreement on this matter, superseding all previous negotiations or agreements.”
. . . .
“This agreement contains the entire understanding among the parties and supersedes any prior understandings and/or written or oral agreements among them respecting the within subject matter. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between or among the parties hereto relating to the subject matter hereof that are not fully expressed herein.”
. . . .
“This contract is intended by the parties to be the full and final expression of their agreement and shall not be contradicted by any prior written or oral agreement.”
Without a merger clause in your contract, litigation over the contract terms will involve such evidence as verbal promises, correspondence, and other statements that may have been made that were not embodied clearly in the written contract. That means the litigation can get very complicated and expensive.
Have Your Contract Reviewed by Attorneys at KPPB LAW
You should not enter into a contract before you have an attorney review it. An experienced contract attorney can ensure that your contract captures all key aspects of the transaction. With respect to merger clauses, you want to be sure that the contract has one that is specific and tailored to the contract itself and not merely boilerplate from another contract.
Be sure you speak to the attorneys at KPPB LAW. Their Dispute Resolution and Litigation Attorneys are very experienced in contract reviews and disputes. Contact them for more information about your case.