Leverage our expertise for investment & business interests in India.
Learn more.>
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

KPPB LAW

Corporate Law Firm

  • About Us
  • Attorneys
  • Practices
    • Asset Based Lending
    • Bankruptcy Law
      • Chapter 7
      • Chapter 11
      • Purchasing Assets
      • Creditor Committee Representation
    • Business Debt Collection
    • Business Divorce
    • Commercial Loan Workouts
    • Commercial Real Estate Finance
    • Commercial Real Estate Transactions
    • Construction Law
      • Construction Project Planning
      • Construction Claims and Disputes
      • Construction Contracts
    • Contract Law
    • Corporate Governance
      • Formation of Entities
    • Cross — Border Transactions
    • DEI Strategic Counseling
    • Hotel Law
    • Immigration Law
    • India Practice
    • Intellectual Property
    • Investment Management
    • Labor & Employment Law
      • Employment Litigation
    • Landlord/Tenant Law
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Securities
    • Tax Law
    • Technology Law
    • Trusts & Estates
  • Firm News
  • Legal Blog
  • 1-678-443-2244
  • Contact Us

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

Home › Labor & Employment Law › Employment Litigation › The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) prohibits private employers with 15 or more employees from discriminating against persons with disabilities in various aspects of employment, including:

  • Applications processes
  • Hiring
  • Firing
  • Advancement
  • Compensation, and
  • Job Training.

The ADA applies to both physical and mental disabilities.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for enforcing the ADA with regard to private employers, while the Department of Justice (DOJ) is vested with enforcement authority where state and local government employers are concerned. Individuals who have been discriminated against also have a private right of action under the ADA, meaning that they can sue the discriminating organization directly.

At a glance, the prohibition on discrimination may appear straightforward as it would clearly seem to violate the ADA to limit the prospects of an employee or otherwise treat him or her differently on the basis of disability. However, ADA compliance is actually far more complex. For example, an employer may violate the ADA by failing to make reasonable accommodations for a disabled employee, or by declining to hire an applicant due to the necessity of making accommodations.

Reasonable Accommodation Under the ADA

One of the most challenging questions for an employer attempting to comply with the ADA is “What constitutes ‘reasonable accommodation’?” Some clear and relatively simple forms of accommodation include modifying a physical work environment to make it accessible by a disabled employee, whether that means modifying a desk to accommodate a wheelchair or providing visual signals for a deaf person in a context that usually employs audio notifications.

However, the accommodations required may be more complicated and extensive. Some examples include:

  • Adaptation of testing materials used to qualify applicants for employment or promotion
  • Employment of third parties to provide services such as reading or interpretation
  • Restructuring of work schedules to accommodate limitations or medical treatment schedules
  • Unpaid time off to pursue treatment

Some accommodations even extend into actions you might not think of as accommodation at all, such as reassigning employees to available positions that accommodated their disabilities without considering other applicants.

In short, it can be difficult to assess exactly what is required of you in terms of providing accommodation for a disabled applicant or employee. That is particularly true because the “undue hardship” exception to the reasonable accommodation requirement may not mean exactly what the average business person might expect.

Undue Hardship Under ADA

The ADA does not require an employer to provide accommodation for a disabled applicant or employee if that accommodation would cause an undue hardship. As a business person, your first thought is probably to the costs associated with making an accommodation, but cost alone is generally not enough to establish an undue hardship.

The simple definition of “undue hardship” under the Act is one requiring “significant difficulty or expense.” However, the statute then goes on to set forth several factors, including the resources of the organization, the nature of the accommodation, the nature of the operation, the size of the business and the impact of the accommodation on operations. Larger organizations with more resources may be expected to invest more in reasonable accommodation than a small business operating with a lean budget.

Enforcement of ADA

The EEOC is empowered to bring suit against private employers for violations of the ADA, and individuals who feel they have been discriminated against on the basis of a mental or physical disability may also bring suit directly. Often, it is possible to negotiate a remedy, even before suit has been filed. Thus, if an employee or applicant has filed a charge against you with the EEOC or you have reason to believe a lawsuit is contemplated, seek help from a qualified labor and employment attorney as soon as possible.

Request More Information About ADA Claims

The best time to protect yourself from a lawsuit under the ADA is before the claim arises. If you are uncertain about the necessary procedures or accommodations, generally or in a particular circumstance, do not try to sort it out alone. Retain guidance from an experienced labor and employment attorney before you make any decisions.

If you are being investigated or have been sued, time is of the essence. However, it may be risky to take any action or engage with the employee/applicant or the EEOC without professional advice. In that circumstance, it is all the more important that you seek legal assistance right away.


Litigation & Dispute Resolution Attorneys at KPPB LAW

Roy Banerjee 1x1
Roy Banerjee

Partner
Chris Ferguson 1x1-5
Chris Ferguson

Associate
Ajay
Ajay Harish

Associate
KPPB LAW - David Sarkan profile-2
David V. Sarkan

Associate

info@kppblaw.com


Footer

GEORGIA

[Corporate Office]
One Lakeside Commons
Suite 800
990 Hammond Drive
Atlanta, GA 30328
678.443.2220
View Map

NEW YORK

575 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1400
New York, NY 10017
203.875.0808
View Map

CONNECTICUT

470 James Street
New Haven, Connecticut 06513
203.800.7417
View Map

+
161 Kings Hwy E / First Floor
Fairfield, Connecticut 06825
203.576.9211
View Map

VIRGINIA

7330 Heritage Village Plaza
Suite 201
Gainesville, Virginia 20155
571.248.2566
View Map

ILLINOIS

Chicago
312.857.5264
View Map

© 2025 KPPB LAW · All Rights Reserved · Legal Disclaimer

Website powered by 321 Web Marketing

We and the third parties that provide content, functionality, or business services on our website may use cookies to collect information about your browsing activities in order to provide you with more relevant content and promotional materials, on and off the website, and help us understand your interests and improve the website.Ok