• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

KPPB LAW

Corporate Law Firm

  • About Us
  • Attorneys
  • Practices
    • Asset Based Lending
    • Bankruptcy Law
      • Chapter 7
      • Chapter 11
      • Purchasing Assets
      • Creditor Committee Representation
    • Business Debt Collection
    • Commercial Loan Workouts
    • Commercial Real Estate Finance
    • Commercial Real Estate Transactions
    • Construction Law
      • Construction Project Planning
      • Construction Claims and Disputes
      • Construction Contracts
    • Contract Law
    • Corporate Governance
      • Formation of Entities
    • Cross — Border Transactions
    • Hotel Law
    • Immigration Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Labor & Employment Law
      • Employment Litigation
    • Landlord/Tenant Law
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Securities
    • Tax Law
    • Technology Law
    • Trusts & Estates
  • Firm News
  • Legal Blog
  • 1-678-443-2244
  • Contact Us

Intellectual Property · May 19, 2016 · by KPPB LAW

Obama Signs the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016

› Intellectual Property › Obama Signs the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016

On May 12, 2016 President Obama signed the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (“DTSA”) into law, creating for the first time Federal cause of action for misappropriation of trade secrets, and placing trade secrets in virtually the same sphere of relevance as patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Major highlights of the law are summarized below.

DTSA/State Law

The new law does not replace individual state trade secret laws, however it makes significant strides toward providing a uniform set of rules for trade secret protection throughout the US. Importantly, the DTSA provides rules that set forth a definition of a trade secret, the acts and the proof necessary to show misappropriation, as well as available remedies. Instead of relying on individual state definitions, plaintiffs may now utilize the uniform definitions provided by DTSA to enforce and protect their rights across state lines.

Civil Seizure

In situations comprising “extraordinary circumstances”, the DTSA provides a mechanism for plaintiffs to protect their trade secrets via civil seizure of the relevant property. The purpose of civil seizure is to allow businesses to utilize courts to temporarily seize property in order to prevent the dissemination of a trade secret until a full hearing takes place. In order for a court to issue an ex parte seizure order, several determinations must be made, including (but not limited to) establishing the following:

  • Other forms of relief would be inadequate, immediate and irreparable injury would occur without the seizure.
  • The party requesting the seizure would likely prevail in its cause of action to demonstrate trade secret misappropriation by the party subject to the seizure order,
  • The party subject to the seizure order would likely destroy the property (unless it is seized).

Additionally, the DTSA requires that the party requesting the order must not publicize the request for the seizure order.

Damages & Remedies

The DTSA provides traditional injunctive relief and damages, “exemplary damages,” (which are not to exceed double damages) and attorneys’ fees. In circumstances where misappropriation is “willful and malicious”, or a claim of misappropriation is filed in bad faith, or a motion to terminate an injunction is made or opposed in bad faith, attorneys’ fees are available.

In addition, the DTSA amends the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 by increasing the maximum penalty for a criminal violation from $5 million to “the greater of $5,000,000 or 3 times the value of the stolen trade secret to the organization, including expenses for research and design and other costs of reproducing the trade secret that the organization has thereby avoided.”

Immunity for Confidential Disclosure

In circumstances where a trade secret must be revealed, for example to a law enforcement official for exposing or reporting a violation of law, the DTSA provides immunity to the whistleblower. Importantly, in agreements governing the use of a trade secret or other confidential information with an employee, signed or updated after the DTSA’s enactment, employers now have a mandatory duty to explain that a confidential disclosure to government officials or attorneys “solely” for purposes of reporting or investigating a “suspected violation of the law” (or disclosures made in an under-seal complaint) is immune from civil and criminal liabilities under federal and state trade secret laws. In the absence of such a statement, a trade secret owner loses the right to seek fee-shifting or exemplary damages for misappropriation.

Employers are advised to review and revise confidentiality and trade secrets provisions in employment agreements and standalone confidentiality and trade secrets agreements to include the new disclosure immunity notices (or cross-reference applicable policies). Although pre-enactment agreements governing use of confidential information or trade secrets are grandfathered, employers that take these remedial steps promptly will preserve their right to seek attorneys’ fees and exemplary damages in the event of an actionable willful and malicious misappropriation down the road.

Recommendations From KPPB LAW

In light of the DTSA, we recommend that employers revisit company trade secret policies to ensure that they are in line with the provisions of the new law. The protection of trade secrets places responsibilities on employers to take active measures to preserve confidentiality. In addition, we recommend that employers update employment agreements to reflect the new immunity provisions.

The lawyers at KPPB LAW regularly advise clients on the protection of their intellectual property including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets and are available to assist with the implementation of new policies and requirements. For more information on the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 and its impacts, contact KPPB LAW at 678.443.2220 or email us at info@kppblaw.com.

If you are considering litigation related to a contract dispute, consider the value range of your matter with the investment of engaging an attorney to be sure your legal action makes fiscal and business sense.

Filed Under: Intellectual Property

Legal Disclaimer*

Articles published by KPPB LAW are purely for educational purposes and provide generalized information of the topic(s) covered. These articles should not be considered as legal advice.

Please contact the attorneys at KPPB LAW for more information regarding your case.

Contact Us

Primary Sidebar

Ready to speak with an attorney?

Call Now!

Contact Us

Use the form below. We will review your message and respond in a timely manner.

info@kppblaw.com


Footer

Atlanta, Georgia

One Lakeside Commons
Suite 800
990 Hammond Drive
Atlanta, GA 30328
678-443-2244
[Corporate Office]

Gainesville, Virginia

7330 Heritage Village Plaza
Suite 201
Gainesville, VA 20155
703-594-4040

Chicago, IL


312-857-5263

New York, New York

12 East 49th Street
New York, NY 10017
203-875-0808

© 2023 KPPB LAW · All Rights Reserved · Legal Disclaimer

Website powered by 321 Web Marketing